What we publish
NatureLaw Research publishes two kinds of articles. Presentations and research describe what we do with a tool, a broker or a prop firm, and what our own data shows. Rule guides, comparisons and tables explain in plain English what partners’ official pages say: rules such as profit targets, loss limits, what is allowed and what makes you fail a challenge, and the features and plans of trading tools.
Our articles are information, not investment advice. They don’t tell you what to trade or which firm to choose. See our risk disclaimer.
Where partner facts come from
- Every rule, fee and condition of a partner comes from the partner’s official pages: rules, FAQ, help center, terms, pricing pages or the register of the authority that supervises it.
- We keep these facts in a partner record: a structured file where each value points to its source, with the link and the date we checked it. We also keep a dated copy of each source page.
- Each page says against which official pages its numbers were checked, and on which date.
- If a partner doesn’t publish a value, the field stays empty and doesn’t appear on the page. We don’t estimate rules or fees, and we don’t fill gaps from memory.
- Forums, reviews and comparison sites are never a source for rules or fees.
- Prop firm rules change often. Every partner record has a date by which it must be checked again, sooner for prop firms and brokers than for software. Until it is checked again, the articles that use it can’t be published or updated.
- When an article presents a regulated broker, it shows the broker’s own risk warnings word for word, with the date we copied them.
Tables that cover several partners mark every row as taken from the partner’s official pages and show the date we checked it.
When we write “we”
We write in the first person (“we ran”, “our backtest”, “our challenge”) only when the article is linked to an activity file: our own dated evidence, such as screenshots, platform exports, statements or challenge dashboards, kept on file. Every first-person statement points to its evidence. Without evidence, we write in an impersonal form: what the partner’s rules state, and what that means.
- We never invent experience and never round results in our favor.
- Our results describe one account, one period and one strategy. We say so on the page, and we don’t present them as typical.
- Backtests and simulations are labeled as hypothetical, with the period, the data, the costs assumed and their limits.
- When we show our evidence on a page, we hide personal data such as account numbers, names and email addresses.
- If a partner paid for or provided an activity, for example with a free challenge account or a software license, the article says so.
How we use AI and how articles are reviewed
AI agents do most of the work at NatureLaw Research, each with a separate job. One AI agent reads the partner’s official pages and extracts the facts into the partner record, with the source of each value. A second AI agent, one that didn’t write the record, checks every value against its source before any article can use the record. AI never supplies rules, fees or numbers from memory.
An AI agent writes each article only from records checked this way and, for first-person statements, from our evidence. Another AI agent, one that didn’t write the article, reviews it against the records, the evidence and these rules. An article that fails the review goes back to be corrected; the reviewer doesn’t fix it. Stefano Mastria, the editor, sets these rules and can hold back or correct any article, before or after it is published.
What we don’t do
- We don’t give investment advice, trading signals or personal recommendations.
- We don’t promise profits, payouts, a passed challenge or a funded account.
- We don’t estimate how many traders pass a challenge. We quote a firm’s own figures only with the source and the date.
- We don’t call ourselves an official partner of any company, and we don’t let partners approve or change our articles. How we earn money is explained in our affiliate disclosure.
- We don’t use partners’ logos, or screenshots of their websites, without their written permission.
- We don’t publish thin “top 10” lists.
Corrections and updates
When an article changes after it is published, it gets a changelog at the end that says what changed and when.
If you find a rule, a fee or a number that doesn’t match the partner’s official page, write to [email protected]. We check it against the source. If we got it wrong, we correct the page and record the correction, with its date, in the changelog.
We check samples of published articles again against their sources. When a partner changes a rule that an article reports, we update the record and the article, and log the change.
Who is responsible
NatureLaw Research is edited by Stefano Mastria. Rules and fees are checked by AI agents, as described above: every value in a partner record is checked against its source by an agent that didn’t write the record. Stefano sets the editorial rules on this page, decides the publishing schedule and can hold back or correct any article. Articles are signed with his name and the date the partner’s rules were checked.
More about the site: About NatureLaw Research.
Last updated: October 29, 2026